🎬✨ Bollywood's Selective Outrage? Netizens Question Celebs' Silence on Local Tragedies 🇮🇳🤔
- MediaFx
- 2 hours ago
- 2 min read
TL;DR 📰
Bollywood stars like Alia Bhatt, Priyanka Chopra, and Kareena Kapoor Khan have vocally supported international causes such as the "All Eyes on Rafah" campaign, highlighting the plight of Palestinians in Gaza. However, their relative silence on domestic tragedies, including terror attacks in India and violence against Hindus in Bangladesh, has sparked criticism and debates about selective activism.
🎥 Bollywood's Global Advocacy 🌍
In May 2024, an AI-generated image with the text "All Eyes on Rafah" went viral, drawing attention to Israeli airstrikes in Gaza. Bollywood celebrities, including Alia Bhatt, Priyanka Chopra, Kareena Kapoor Khan, and Varun Dhawan, shared the image on social media, expressing solidarity with Palestinians.
Their posts garnered widespread attention and praise for raising awareness about international human rights issues.
🇮🇳 Silence on Domestic Tragedies Raises Eyebrows 🤨
Despite their global advocacy, many of these celebrities remained silent on domestic incidents, such as the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025, where 26 tourists were killed. While some actors like Shah Rukh Khan, Akshay Kumar, and Allu Arjun condemned the attack, others who had been vocal about international issues did not comment publicly.
Similarly, during the political unrest in Bangladesh in August 2024, which saw violence against Hindus, only a few Bollywood figures, including Sonam Kapoor and Kangana Ranaut, spoke out. The majority remained silent, leading to criticism and the trending of hashtags like #AllEyesOnBangladeshHindus.
🗣️ Public Backlash and Accusations of Selective Activism 🔥
The apparent inconsistency in Bollywood's activism has led to public backlash. Critics argue that celebrities are quick to comment on international issues but hesitant to address domestic tragedies, possibly due to political sensitivities or fear of backlash.
This selective advocacy has sparked debates about the authenticity of celebrity activism and whether it is driven by genuine concern or curated public relations strategies.
🧠 MediaFx Perspective: Advocating for Consistent and Inclusive Activism ✊
From a working-class and socialist viewpoint, the inconsistency in celebrity activism reflects broader societal issues. True solidarity should transcend borders and be inclusive of all victims of injustice, regardless of their nationality or religion.
Celebrities, given their influence, have a responsibility to advocate for all marginalized communities, both domestically and internationally. Selective activism not only undermines their credibility but also overlooks the struggles of many who face oppression and violence.
It's imperative for public figures to use their platforms to highlight all forms of injustice, ensuring that their advocacy is rooted in genuine concern and a commitment to equality.
🔚 Final Thoughts
The debate over Bollywood's selective activism underscores the need for consistent and inclusive advocacy. As public figures, celebrities must recognize the impact of their voices and strive to support all victims of injustice, both at home and abroad.
